ScottFeinberg.com

By Joey Magidson
Film Contributor

***

Everyone knows the saying “it’s an honor just to be nominated,” right? Well, that’s certainly the case, but there are always times when it just doesn’t seem right for a film to leave Oscar night empty handed. Tons of worthy films aren’t even nominated each year, but there is also no shortage of flicks that receive a solid amount of nominations and wind up winning nothing.

A lot goes into actually winning an Academy Award. Quality, of course, comes into play, but a little less than I’d prefer. Politics has its place, too, both in terms of capturing the zeitgeist and also in campaigning for the win. Oscar voters love to be wooed. One can occasionally win without campaigning, but by and large the Academy wants you to want it.

While it’s not included below, Up in the Air is a great recent example of a film that went from looking like a possible Best Picture frontrunner to hanging its hat on an Adapted Screenplay win to winding up without any wins on Oscar night, despite six nominations overall. It’s a long road from nomination morning to the show itself, so many a high quality film has had its moment ruined by another worthy (or at least usually worthy) contender. This year, at least a few similar movies will have that same empty feeling, but I’ll get to them later on.

For this week’s Top 10 piece I opted to do things a little bit differently. Instead of limiting it to 10 films that had multiple Oscar nominations but won nothing, I’ll be looking at 10 groups of films that have that sad distinction. It allows more work to be discussed, a wider net to be cast for answers and a nice change of pace.

Read the rest of this entry »

On Monday morning, I had the opportunity to sit down for a chat in Beverly Hills with the man who is arguably the greatest director of all time, Martin Scorsese.

Click to read more…

Nine awards seasons ago, two op-eds — both involving the Miramax film Gangs of New York (2002) — motivated the Academy to begin cracking down on “distasteful” Oscar campaigning, an effort that continues to this day.

Click to read more…

By Rhett Bartlett

The National Board of Review (NBR) announced their 2011 awards this past week.
23 categories were announced, but among all what you have read about who won what, and who didnt – here are 5 stats about the NBR Awards for 2011, that you probably did not know.

Click to read more…

By Sean O’Connell

“Pulp Fiction.” “The English Patient.” “Good Will Hunting.” “Shakespeare in Love.” “Chicago.” “The Aviator.” “Gangs of New York.” “The Reader.” “The King’s Speech.”

For decades, Harvey Weinstein’s name has been synonymous with the Academy Awards, and his influential fingerprints have been all over the Oscar season.

Click to read more…

I’m very pleased to bring you the sixth episode of “Feinberg & Friends,” a podcast about the awards race that airs on The Race every week, usually on Tuesdays.

Each episode features a discussion between me and a different guest — a film blogger, critic or journalist of some other variation — about 10 different awards-related topics (which we list in the text accompanying the audio so that you know exactly what you’re signing up for) and runs for approximately 30 minutes (so that if one topic is not of particular interest to you it will only be about three minutes before we’re on to the next one, which hopefully will be).

I was delighted that my friend Sasha Stone, whose Oscar blog AwardsDaily.com was one of the first on the Web (it was established in 1999 as OscarWatch.com), agreed to join me for this episode. I really enjoyed our chat, during which we tackled the following 10 questions…

Click to read more…

The vast majority of this year’s awards hopefuls have already played at least once on the festival circuit (Sundance, Berlin, Cannes, Telluride, Toronto, and/or New York) and/or gone into general release. Most of those that have not are set for October or November releases. But a select few others are being held until December, the last month in which they are eligible to qualify for Oscar consideration this year, and only being selectively screened for the press before then, if at all.

Click to read more…

• In Contention: Kris Tapley chats with “Shutter Island” best director hopeful Martin Scorsese and best actor hopeful Leonardo DiCaprio about their work on that film, as well as their three prior collaborations — “Gangs of New York” (2002), “The Aviator” (2004), and “The Departed” (2006) — each of which snagged best picture nods at a time when the category had only five slots. DiCaprio recalls, “At 18 years old, I remember having a conversation with my father and we talked about opportunities that were going to come up and he said, ‘You know, there’s really one guy [Scorsese], if you ever get the opportunity to work for him, you have to go for it.’ So I really researched the films that he was going to do and films that he wanted to do.” Scorsese adds, “It’s very rewarding for me to have a collaborator at this stage in my life, particularly someone who is 30 years younger than me and of another generation.”

• The Hollywood Reporter: Kim Masters learns that James L. Brooks’s dramedy “How Do You Know” cost a jaw-dropping $150 million before tax incentives reduced that figure to $100 million, a still-shocking number. According to Masters, “One reason for the price tag is old-fashioned salaries for the pic’s talent: Reese Witherspoon ($15 million), Jack Nicholson ($12 million), Owen Wilson ($10 million) and Paul Rudd ($3 million) received their quotes, and Brooks will earn about $10 million plus backend for writing, producing and directing. That’s about $50 million for the major talent alone.” Considering that “Spanglish” (2004), Brooks’s most recent film, made only $55 million overall on an $80 million budget, “How Do You Know” is clearly a huge gamble for Columbia.

• Box Office Mojo: Last week, in one of the more remarkable box-office stories to emerge in recent memory, the little indie “Black Swan,” which cost $13 million and was playing in only 18 theaters, beat out the studio fantasy/ninja/comedy/epic “The Warrior’s Way,” a film that was showing in 90 times as many theaters. This is not a criticism of the latter picture, but rather an encouraging sign about the commercial prospects of well-made smaller pictures like the former picture.

• Deadline Hollywood: Pete Hammond, reiterating the content of a post that went up on this site on Tuesday, writes that David O. Russell’s boxing drama “The Fighter” has emerged as a “a new heavyweight contender” in this year’s Oscar race. Following the film’s Los Angeles premiere on Monday night, Hammond reports, numerous prominent members of the Academy were overheard offering unusually enthusiastic reactions to the film. One member of the directors branch, for instance, volunteered, “I think I’ve just seen the best picture of the year.” An “exec close to the film’s campaign” told Hammond, “I know I should be drinking coffee but I am starting to drink my own Kool Aid. I think this thing is really starting to take off.”

• Los Angeles Times: Susan King traces the roots of the film industry’s “long love affair” with movies about boxing — the sport that “reigns supreme” in Hollywood –  and highlights some of the Academy’s favorite pugilists throughout the years, from Wallace Beery, who won the best actor Oscar for his performance in “The Champ” (1931), through Mark Wahlberg, who many believe is worthy of a nomination in that same category for his work in this year’s “The Fighter.” Film-noir historian Alan K. Rode tells King, “I think one of the attractions to writers and filmmaking with boxing is that you have the most admirable of characterizations and then the absolute lowest dregs in such close proximity that it makes for compelling stories.”

Photo: Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese on the set of “Shutter Island.” Credit: Paramount.

• Deadline Hollywood: Pete Hammond details the “high profile kick-off” to Paramount’s Oscar campaign for its February release “Shutter Island” — namely, an American Cinematheque retrospective celebrating the collaboration of the film’s director Martin Scorsese and star Leonardo DiCaprio. “Shutter,” as well as the three previous films on which they collaborated — “Gangs of New York” (2002), “The Aviator” (2004), and “The Departed” (2006), each of which snagged best picture nods at a time when the category had only five slots – will be screened over the weekend of November 13-14, after which Scorsese (via satellite) and DiCaprio (in-person) will participate in a “conversation” about them.
• USA Today: Maria Puente wonders if “The Social Network” can/will become “the iconic film for this generation of young adults.” The measure by which she seems to feel we will find the answer? Its commercial performance. The film came in first at the box-office during both of its first two weekends in release and has accrued $64 million in total receipts, thus far, but one self-appointed box-office “guru” dismisses it as “still a niche situation.”
• The Hollywood Reporter: Jay A. Fernandez reports that Paramount has moved up the release date for “Morning Glory” — a rom-com starring Rachel McAdams, Harrison Ford, and Diane Keaton — by two days, from Friday, November 12 to Wednesday, November 10. The move is believed to be part of “”an attempt by the studio to capture the attention of moviegoers ahead of the weekend and get a potential jump on good word of mouth to pull viewers away from the other options,” which in this case will include the Denzel Washington action flick “Unstoppable” and the sci-fi thriller “Skyline.”
• Gold Derby: Tom O’Neil senses that Oscar buzz for Jim Carrey’s performance in “I Love You Phillip Morris” — a film in which Carrey plays a married man who leaves his wife to live his life as a gay man — has already come and gone. ”Playing gay is usually an Oscar-savvy move for straight actors,” O’Neil asserts, but this part “looks a bit too silly and camp” for the Academy members’ tastes.
• Awards Daily: Sasha Stone finally catches up with “127 Hours,” which received a very strong reception at Telluride and Toronto, and is not disappointed. “I don’t think I’ve ever spent a more riveting or emotionally moving hour and a half in the theater,” she writes. “It confirms what I already knew about Danny Boyle: that he is a genius visually, intellectually, emotionally.  He knows that it isn’t just the story of how [Aron] Ralston got out of that canyon; it’s that key bit of truth we all must remind ourselves of everyday: life is not lived alone.” She adds, “Who knew James Franco was capable of this?  I certainly didn’t… he is going to be ["The King's Speech" star] Colin Firth’s biggest threat.”

Photo: Leonardo DiCaprio in “Shutter Island.” Credit: Paramount.